Samsung Galaxy A55 vs Vivo T5 Lite 5G vs Vivo Y500
Compare Samsung Galaxy A55, Vivo T5 Lite 5G and Vivo Y500 side by side — see how they stack up on price, camera, battery, performance, display and full specifications, with the winner in each key spec highlighted below.
📱 Compare with suggested mobiles
🏆 The Verdict — Category Winners
Quick Specs
|
×
Samsung Galaxy A55 |
×
Vivo T5 Lite 5G |
×
Vivo Y500 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Price & Best Deals |
—
|
—
|
—
|
| Display | 6.6″ / 120Hz | 6.74″ / 120Hz | — |
| Max RAM | — | — | — |
| Main Camera | 50.0 MP | 50.0 MP | — |
| Selfie Camera | 32.0 MP | 5.0 MP | — |
| Pixel Density | — | 260 ppi | — |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6500 mAh | — |
| Fast Charging | 25W | 44W | — |
| Charging Time (20-100%) | — | 38 min | — |
| Fabrication | — | 6 nm | — |
| AnTuTu Score | 655,890 | 571,015 | — |
| Battery Life (PCMark) | — | — | — |
| Peak Brightness | — | 1200 nits | — |
| Spec Score | 73.6/100 | 59.9/100 | 62.7/100 |
| 5G | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes | ✗ No |
| 3.5mm Jack | ✗ No | ✓ Yes | ✗ No |
| Stereo Speakers | ✓ Yes | ✗ No | ✗ No |
| Fingerprint | Under Display | Side | — |
| SIM | Dual Esim | Dual | — |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | — |
✅ Highlighted cells show the better value for that spec (bigger battery, more MP, higher RAM, lower price, lower nm, higher AnTuTu, faster charging).
Expert Review
|
Samsung Galaxy A55 73.6
Spec Score / 100
★ 3.7/5
Overall Rating
Design
4.1/5
Display
3.8/5
Camera
4.0/5
Performance
3.2/5
Battery
3.5/5
Software
4.0/5
|
Vivo T5 Lite 5G 59.9
Spec Score / 100
★ 3.0/5
Overall Rating
Design
3.3/5
Display
2.3/5
Camera
2.1/5
Performance
2.7/5
Battery
4.6/5
Software
3.6/5
|
Vivo Y500 62.7
Spec Score / 100
★ 3.1/5
Overall Rating
Design
3.7/5
Display
3.5/5
Camera
2.1/5
Performance
3.4/5
Battery
3.2/5
Software
3.6/5
|
| Specification |
×
Samsung Galaxy A55 |
×
Vivo T5 Lite 5G |
×
Vivo Y500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Network | |||
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| SIM 1 bands | 5G bands, 4G bands | - | - |
| SIM 2 bands | 5G bands, 4G bands | - | - |
| Launch | |||
| Announced | 2024, March 11 | 2026, July 16 | 2026, July 07 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, March 15 | Released 2026, July 22 | Released 2026, July 07 |
| Body | |||
| Design score | |||
| Dimensions | 161.1 x 77.4 x 8.2 mm (6.34 x 3.05 x 0.32 in) | 167.4 x 77.1 x 8.4 mm (6.59 x 3.04 x 0.33 in) | 163.7 x 76.2 x 8.2 mm (6.44 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| Weight | 213 grams | 209 g | 210 g (7.41 oz) |
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus+), glass back (Gorilla Glass) | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| SIM | SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano (Hybrid) | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| IP rating | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | IP65 dust tight and water resistant (low pressure water jets) MIL-STD-810H compliant* * does not guarantee ruggedness or use in extreme conditions Drop resistant up to 1.2m | IP68/IP69 dust tight and water resistant (high pressure water jets; immersible up to 1.5m for 30 min) MIL-STD-810H compliant* |
| Other Details | aluminum frame | RGB notifications light (on the back) | * does not guarantee ruggedness or use in extreme conditions |
| Display | |||
| Display score | |||
| Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, 120Hz | AMOLED, HDR, 120Hz, 2000 nits (HBM), |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 106.9 cm2 (~85.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.74 inches, 109.7 cm2 | 6.83 inches, 112.6 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~390 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio | 260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio |
| Aspect Ratio | - | ~85.0% screen-to-body ratio | - |
| Pixel Density (PPI) | - | ~260 ppi density | ~450 ppi density |
| Refresh Rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | - |
| Peak Brightness | - | 1200 nits | 5000 nits |
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ | - | - |
| Platform | |||
| Performance score | |||
| OS | Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 8.5 | Android 16, Origin OS 6 | Android 16, OriginOS 6 |
| Chipset | Exynos 1480 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 | Unisoc T7300 |
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| GPU | Xclipse 530 | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MP2 |
| Architecture | 64 bit | 64 bit | - |
| Fabrication | 4 nm | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| Memory | |||
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| RAM Type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X | - |
| Storage Type | - | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera | |||
| Camera score | |||
| Main | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.93", PDAF Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.93" Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie Camera | |||
| Camera score | |||
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Features | - | Panorama | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | |||
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes | No |
| Comms | |||
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | No | No |
| Infrared port | No | No | No |
| Radio | No | FM radio | - |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| USB OTG | Yes | - | - |
| Features | |||
| Sensors | Fingerprint , accelerometer, gyro, compass,Virtual proximity sensing | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Fingerprint Sensor | under display, optical | - | - |
| Battery | |||
| Battery score | |||
| Type | Li-Ion | Si/C Li-Ion | Si/C Li-Ion |
| Capacity | 5000 mAh | 6500 mAh | 8100 mAh |
| Removable | No | No | No |
| Charging | 25W wired | 44W wired | 44W wired |
| Charging Time (20-100%) | 1h 17m | 50% in 38 min | - |
| Wireless Charging | No | - | - |
| Other Details | - | Reverse wired | Reverse wired Bypass charging |
| Misc | |||
| Colors | Iceblue, Lilac, Navy, Lemon | Twilight Shadow, Wave Blue | Midnight Blue, Pearl White |
| Models | SM-A556B | V2557 | - |
| SAR | - | 1.14 W/kg - head 1.12 W/kg - body | - |
| SAR EU | 0.68 W/kg (head) 1.04 W/kg (body) | - | - |
| Tests | |||
| Performance | AnTuTu: 655890 | - | - |
| Display | 1010 nits max brightness | - | - |
| Loudspeaker | -25.7 LUFS | - | - |
Frequently Asked Questions
Samsung Galaxy A55 scores highest overall in this comparison, with a spec score of 73.6/100. The spec score weighs performance, display, camera, battery and value together, so treat it as a starting point rather than a verdict — the right phone still depends on which of those you care about most.
Vivo T5 Lite 5G has the largest battery at 6500 mAh. It charges at up to 44W. Capacity is only part of endurance: chipset efficiency and screen refresh rate affect how long a charge actually lasts.
Samsung Galaxy A55 is the fastest on paper, topping the AnTuTu benchmark at 655,890. Benchmarks measure short bursts, so a phone with better sustained thermals can still feel quicker in long gaming sessions.